FRAUD UNDER INDIAN CONTRACT ACT

The Indian Contract Act of 1872, which establishes a legal framework for the creation, performance, and implementation of contracts, is the cornerstone of contractual agreements in the country of India. Fraud is a constant risk in the field of contracts, jeopardizing the core principles that guide business deals.

Fraud in contracts: About

A number of actions conducted by a party to a contract, their accomplice, or their agent with the intent to deceive or convince another party, or their agent, to sign an agreement are collectively referred to as fraud in contracts.

According to section 17 of indian contract act, fraud is defined as any conduct committed by a party to a contract, with that party’s permission (willingness to allow), or by that party’s agents, with the intention of deceiving or tricking the other party, his agent, or to persuade him to enter into a contract.

These include the following:

• Presenting anything that is obviously false as fact.
• Wilfully hiding a fact from someone who is aware of it or thinks it to be true.
• Making a promise you don’t plan to follow through on.
• Using dishonesty in any other way.
• Taking part in any actions that are specifically defined as fraudulent by law.

It is not fraud in contracts to simply keep quiet regarding facts that might sway someone’s decision to sign a contract, unless the circumstances require the person in silence to take responsibility for their words or if their silence constitutes speech in and of itself.

For instance: A sells the horse to B at auction even though A knows it is unsound, and A conceals this fact from B. This isn’t fraud in part of A.

Fraud under indian contract act: Ingredients

The ingredients of fraud under section 17 of indian contract actare listed in the following order:

• The concept must have originated from someone who does not believe the recommendation is true;
• The suggestion must be made based on fact;
• The recommended fact cannot be correct; and
• The suggestion must be made with the intent to deceive or coerce the other party into signing the contract.

Fraud under indian contract act:Situations that Qualify as Fraud

False Statement without Faith in Its Truthfulness:

• To prove fraud, it must be shown that the individual making the assertions was aware that they were false.
• The assertion must be false in both substance and practice. It is not necessary to be positive about lying.
• Fraud demands that the person making the statement did so knowing it was false or not believing it to be true.

Reckless Statements:

• To prove fraud under indian contract act, one only needs to show that there was no genuine and honest belief, regardless of how carelessly or intentionally the claim was made.
• The person’s negligence or indifference to the truthfulness or falsity of the portrayal demonstrates a lack of belief.
• Vendors who intentionally or negligently misrepresent the ownership of a product cannot escape being punished with false misrepresentation.  Recklessly made assertions would be classified as statements made without conviction.

Statement that is Uncertain:

• If a representative makes a statement that is not entirely clear, the person to whom the statement is directed must show that he understood the statement to be false.
• Not if he meant the statement to be read that way, but rather if the representor genuinely believes the statement to be true but the person relying on it interprets it otherwise, the representor will be found guilty of fraud.

Active Concealment:

• Active concealment is the deliberate withholding by one party of material details regarding the contract from the other, even though they are obligated to disclose it. 
• It is important to keep in mind that in this situation, silence is intended to be passive concealment.
• This means that if a party remains silent in situations when speaking would be expected of them or if their silence would be seen as talking, they may be in breach of the Indian Contract Act.

Promise not Intending to Keep:

• This is considered fraudunder section 17 of indian contract act, even if it’s not legal under English law.
• A case must show that the promisor did not intend to keep the promise when it was made in order for it to qualify under this provision.
• Any remarks or acts taken after the event are not relevant.

The Indian Contract Act defines fraud as when someone makes a promise they don’t intend to keep or hides or avoids a fact they know or believe to be true.

Therefore, merely remaining silent about certain material facts that influence someone’s decision to enter into a contract would not be seen as fraud. However, if it were considered speech or if the individual had to reveal the events and information to the other party, then their silence would be considered fraud.

For any latest news, legal topics, judiciary exams notifications, patterns, etc watch Jyoti Judiciary’s YouTube channel for legal videos for any updates at https://youtube.com/@jyotijudiciarycoaching4852?si=2cwubh9d2A9urwJf